The dialectic of legality in modern political and legal thought

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article examines the problems of the dialectic of legality, which serves as an appropriate basis for understanding and interpreting the combination of abstract semantic and real-material (figurative) characteristics in it. This approach introduces significant clarifications to the idea of legality as a fundamental legal idea, which at different levels of its hierarchy (internal and external) is accompanied by important points and relevant features. Based on the achievements of the Russian philosophical tradition, the author demonstrates the possibilities of considering legality as an idea in terms of its expression in reality and the influence of various dominants of an internal and external nature. This allows us to determine the role of schematism, illustrativeness, as well as the possibility of achieving a balanced ratio of abstract semantic and figurative aspects of legality. The proposed understanding of the dialectic of legality makes it possible to significantly review the effectiveness and cognitive potential of various interpretations of the idea of legality in the political and legal doctrines of the past and present, to clarify the originality and place of the corresponding interpretations in the evolution of ideas about basic legal issues such as legality, law and order, the legal system, etc. The article also shows that current trends in the analysis of legality in foreign literature focus on issues that have already taken place in legal studies of the past, especially in Russian philosophical and legal literature.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Artyom Savenkov

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: artem.199417@yandex.ru

PhD in Law, Director of Legal and Corporate Development, NASK JSC, Post-Doctoral Student

俄罗斯联邦, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

参考

  1. Alekseev V. P. The struggle for the idea of legality in Moscow Russia. M., 1909 (in Russ.).
  2. Voplenko N. N. Socialist legality and the application of law / ed. by M. I. Baitin. Saratov, 1983 (in Russ.).
  3. Hegel G. Essays / ed. by A. Deborin and D. Ryazanov. M. – L., 1934. Pp. 23, 24 (in Russ.).
  4. Gorban V. S. The legal doctrine of Jering and his interpretations. M., 2018 (in Russ.).
  5. Gorban V. S. The formation of a modern historiographical model of political and legal knowledge // State and Law. 2024. No. 7. Pp. 64–78 (in Russ.).
  6. The idea of legality // Law. Weekly legal newspaper. St. Petersburg, 1899. No. 49 (November 28). Stb. 2299– 2306 (in Russ.).
  7. Kovalev V. A. Bourgeois legality: theoretical illusions and judicial-police reality. Moscow, 1986 (in Russ.).
  8. Kun T. The structure of scientific revolutions: collection / transl. from English. M., 2003 (in Russ.).
  9. Losev A. F. Dialectic of myth; Supplement to the “Dialectic of myth”. M., 2001. Vol. 130. Pp. 153, 154 (in Russ.).
  10. Lukasheva E. A. Legal awareness and legality in a socialist society (Ideological and socio-psychological factors of ensuring legality): abstract … Doctor of Law. M., 1973 (in Russ.).
  11. Nersesyants V. S. Philosophy of Law. M., 1997 (in Russ.).
  12. Petrazhitsky L. I. Introduction to the study of law and morality: fundamentals of emotional psychology. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, 1908. P. 2 (in Russ.).
  13. Pigolkin A. S. Law and legality in Soviet society. M., 1971 (in Russ.).
  14. Savenkov A. N. Philosophy of Law and the formation of the Russian state-civilization. M., 2024. P. 10 (in Russ.).
  15. Sinyukov V. N. The Russian legal system an introduction to General theory. 2nd ed., supplement. M., 2010. Pp. 506, 507 (in Russ.).
  16. Socialist legality and state discipline / ed. by V. N. Kudryavtsev. M., 1975 (in Russ.).
  17. Shapiro S. Legality / transl. from English. M., 2021. Pp. 215, 216, 294, 296 (in Russ.).
  18. Shershenevich G. F. On the sense of legality: a public lecture delivered on March 10, 1897. Kazan, 1897 (in Russ.).
  19. Jhering R. Der Zweck im Recht. Teil: Bd. 1. 4. Aufl. / Erste Ausg. in volkstümlicher Gestalt. Leipzig, 1904.
  20. Winckelmann J. Die Verfassungsrechtliche Unterscheidung von Legitimität und Legalität // Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft / Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1956. Vol. 112. No. 1. Pp. 164–175.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025